Research and discussion for citizens and decision makers

Austin cited for smart policies

For bond to improve streets

Share This

Austin figures in selection of the five “Smartest Policies Enacted by American Cities in 2010” featured on the website Alternet

In Austin, TX, whose frustrating traffic congestion provided the backdrop for the movie “Office Space,” drivers waste an average of one and a half days stuck in traffic every year. Some business leaders pushed for a conventional response to congestion: wider roads and more highways. But the city opted to go down a different path. Recognizing that they could never build enough highways to eliminate traffic congestion, lawmakers instead put a $90 million bond issue on the ballot to improve Austin’s existing streets and make them more hospitable to pedestrians and bicycles. According to blogger Austin Contrarian, “Most of Austin’s roads outside of the central core were laid when the city was more rural than urban. No sidewalks, no bicycle lanes, no sewers, no street trees. But once rural roads now cut through major population centers.” Austin voters approved the bonds on November 2nd. For affirming that transportation investments must include more than just new highway miles, Austin’s bond walks straight onto our list of the best policies of 2010.

Other cities selected for smart policies were Denver, Pittsburg, Cleveland, and New York.

Photo: Austin, TX in 1887. Credit: Augustus Koch; Public Domain

 

More from Megaregion

Comments

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) said:

Great!  That’s awesome!  Can Houston trade the Grand Parkway for this option?

Posted on Jan 11, 11 at 11:35 pm

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) said:

How about trading it for that monstrosity of a widened I-10, connecting downtown to Katy? This, in no way, reduces the number of vehicles or the amount of pollution.

Posted on Jan 19, 11 at 6:36 am

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) said:

Yeah, it’s huge and it’s close to my house.  I think the key comment in the article is where the city, “realizing that they could never build enough highways to alleviate traffic congestion”, decided on an alternate course.  Because as anyone who has ever lived near one of these project understands, the project makes bad traffic worse, sometimes for years, then you get nice traffic flow for a little while, then more cars fill it up and it’s back to square 1. 
Too bad the City of Austin and the Govt of Texas aren’t in the same place.  If they were, the City could share this epiphany with the State face-to-face.

Posted on Jan 31, 11 at 2:24 pm

Page 1 of 1 pages

Name:

Email:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:





Houston Tomorrow
3015 Richmond Ave. Suite 201 Houston, Texas 77098 United States
Phone 713.523.5757

RSS Feed