The following commentary is excerpted from William Fulton’s new book, “Romancing the Smokestack: How Cities and States Pursue Prosperity,” and was published on Citiwire.net.
Twenty-five years ago, when I first started writing about economic development, the governors of seven states went on The Phil Donahue Show — the premiere daytime talk show of its time — begging General Motors to build the assembly plant for its brand-new Saturn brand in their state.
It was, to put it bluntly, a pretty pathetic excuse for an economic development campaign. Even though auto assembly plants don’t literally have smokestacks, this was a pretty stark example of politicians trying to find a short-cut to economic success through the standard technique of “romancing the smokestack” — wooing some out-of-town business in hopes that they will come to town. I always counted the Donahue show as the lowest point in the history of American economic development — especially since none of the seven states got the plant.
At least the Donahue show seemed like the low point until earlier this year, when Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland made a YouTube music video begging basketball star LeBron James to re-sign with the Cleveland Cavaliers. The YouTube music video managed to trivialize both the economic development goal and the means by which that goal is pursued. Somehow a talk show seems almost statesmanlike compared to a music video. And have we sunk so low that the holy grail of economic development is not an auto assembly plant but an individual basketball player? Not that it much mattered. In the end, making a music video didn’t work any better than going on a talk show. The Saturn plan went to Tennessee — at least until GM killed the brand last year — and LeBron went to Florida.
If the humorous failures listed above teach us anything, it is this: There is no magic bullet for prosperity. You can’t just romance the smokestack and hope to succeed, especially in the long run. But there are ways to maximize the chances of enduring success.
The fact that some communities are prosperous and some are not is hardly an accident. In large part, success is the result of deliberate effort on the part of business organizations, nonprofit entities such as research institutions and universities, and — yes — government agencies to nurture the growth and sustainability of particular businesses and particular types of economic activity in particular locations.
There’s nothing new about this. For thousands of years, cities and regions have prospered when they have grabbed emerging economic opportunities and found ways to make sure the economic benefit flows toward them. Sometimes these efforts have been mostly private — as when the Columbian Rope Company, in the midst of the Depression, set up a research lab in my home town and hired my grandfather, a chemistry professor, to run it. Sometimes these have been mostly public — as when the Erie Canal was built by New York State and the interstate highway system was financed by the federal government. And sometimes these efforts have been a combination — as when Congress subsidized the private construction of the transcontinental railroad.
But in the last couple of decades, the activist role of local and regional players has become more evident. Silicon Valley is part of a worldwide economic elite largely because of the presence of Stanford University and the way entrepreneurs have leveraged Stanford’s presence. Dallas and Denver are major cities largely because civic and political leaders built enormous airports — what one former Dallas mayor called “the port to the ocean of the air” — at a time when nobody else was doing so. Pittsburgh continues to prosper — despite the departure of its steel mills and a steady decline in population — because it has reinvented its economy over and over again.
These places are prosperous specifically because they have not tried to romance the smokestack into town. They know that prosperity isn’t dependent on one company or one plant or one person. Prosperity — especially the kind that endures for decades — emerges from a carefully constructed ecosystem that nurtures and sustains skilled labor, innovative entrepreneurs, research breakthroughs, and well-capitalized start-ups. In other words, great cities, large and small, are powered by great prosperity, and the smartest cities — just like the smartest businesses — understand that they have to continually plow the fruits of their prosperity into sustaining and reinventing themselves.
It’s a mysterious process, but it’s pretty miraculous when it works. And it’s a lot more sustainable than pinning your hopes on a basketball player.
Full commentary
Source: Citiwire.net, November 12, 2010
Is the City of Houston shrinking?
The limits of density
New housing forecast mostly good for walkable communities