Research and discussion for citizens and decision makers

Dan Zack

To connect or not to connect?

Share This

Perhaps it is a natural territorial instinct to wall ourselves into a protected enclave. Much has been written about the late 20th Century phenomenon of gated developments, but that isn’t the only time we block access in our neighborhoods. The lollipop cul-de-sac street patterns of many American suburbs are also meant to block; and sometimes older neighborhoods are retrofitted to block auto access, pedestrian access, or both.

As a planner, I see this a lot, but I recently saw it in action in my own neighborhood. I live in an older neighborhood that, for the most part, has a walkable street grid. Slicing diagonally through the neighborhood is a major piece of underground infrastructure. On the surface, some of this land is occupied by parks, some by parking lots, some is incorporated into adjacent private yards (with the caveat that no structures may be constructed over it), and some is vacant and unimproved. Part of it near me was a park, which was ripped out a while ago when the underground infrastructure was upgraded.

Our Parks and Recreation Department held a couple of neighborhood meetings to work on a new design for the reconstruction of this park. This all went very well, and the new park is going to be great, but something really stood out to me. The infrastructure corridor continues past the park through a very long block, providing the potential for a direct pedestrian connection to a major street with some great amenities (including one of the best pizza joints in town). Some of us asked for this stretch, which is presently fenced off, to be opened up. Many people in the area have actively fought this connection, though, and it will not be opened.

Why We Block

Why is this done? In a society that is so obsessed with connectedness of the digital variety, why are some of us shunning connectedness in our cities? I have encountered three primary reasons, all of which are rooted in fear.

• Fear of Traffic. People in single-family neighborhoods, despite often driving a lot, are not big fans of traffic. Specifically, they want their residential streets to be free of large volumes of fast moving cars. Some fear the noise that comes with cars, and some fear for the safety of their children. It is very understandable.

• Fear of On-Street Parking Jams.


• Fear of Crime.


The Problem With Blocking

While I understand these fears, disconnectedness is not the answer. We must resist the urge to block paths and close off neighborhoods from each other. Blocking connections won’t solve any problems, and may create new ones, including:

• Dangerous Dead Ends. If you’re worried about crime, it’s hard to understand how creating dead ends helps anything. Interconnected street networks offer many ways in and out, meaning there are escape routes in case of an emergency. Dead ends got their name for a reason.

• No Eyes on the Street.


• Slower Emergency Response Time.


• More traffic fatalities.


• Jammed Major Streets.


• More vehicle miles travelled.


• Less Walking.


How to address traffic, parking, and crime without blocking

We block because we’re afraid of traffic, parking jams, and crime… but blocking doesn’t fix these problems and only creates additional problems. So what are we do do?


Full Story: To connect or not to connect?
Source: Better! Cities & Towns, September 23, 2013

More Commentary





Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:

Upcoming Events

There are no upcoming events

More Upcoming Events

Livability News


10 Big Things

Hurricane Harvey suggest the need for a fundamentally new paradigm that values the sustainability of life

Mayor Sylvester Turner

Five strategies to facilitate the paradigm shift in transportation

Jay Blazek Crossley

Stop investing in roads to build new neighborhoods that cause other neighborhoods to flood

More Commentary

Houston Tomorrow
1900 Kane St, #111, Houston, TX 77007
Phone 713.523.5757

RSS Feed